<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/utility/FeedStylesheets/atom.xsl" media="screen"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en"><title type="html">KansasVotes</title><subtitle type="html" /><id>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/atom.aspx</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/default.aspx" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/atom.aspx" /><generator uri="http://communityserver.org" version="4.0.30417.1769">Community Server</generator><updated>2009-04-07T15:58:00Z</updated><entry><title>State borrows another $700 million</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/07/07/state-borrows-another-700-million.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/07/07/state-borrows-another-700-million.aspx</id><published>2010-07-07T15:24:00Z</published><updated>2010-07-07T15:24:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The Governor and Legislative leaders just agreed to borrow $700 million from state idle funds in order to help state cashflow.&amp;nbsp; Could these idle funds have been used earlier to avoid tax increases?&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4005" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>site captain</name><uri>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/members/site-captain/default.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>No sale of state assets</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/05/09/no-sale-of-state-assets.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/05/09/no-sale-of-state-assets.aspx</id><published>2010-05-09T18:58:00Z</published><updated>2010-05-09T18:58:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;An alternative to tax increases was defeated in the Legislature recently that would have required the state to sell about 1% of its&amp;nbsp;$10 billion (at least) real estate assets. What do you think of that idea?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3985" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>site captain</name><uri>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/members/site-captain/default.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Local chambers, taxes, business role</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/03/29/local-chambers-taxes-business-role.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/03/29/local-chambers-taxes-business-role.aspx</id><published>2010-03-29T21:41:00Z</published><updated>2010-03-29T21:41:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;When 14 local chambers of commerce sent a letter recently to legislative leaders in support of state tax increases,&amp;nbsp;Sen. Karin Brownlee (R-Olathe) was quoted saying they are ignoring small-business members and, &amp;quot;The chambers have totally forgotten they exist for the promotion of business and not the promotion of government jobs.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3966" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>site captain</name><uri>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/members/site-captain/default.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Tax cuts the culprit?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/03/10/tax-cuts-the-culprit.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/03/10/tax-cuts-the-culprit.aspx</id><published>2010-03-10T23:18:00Z</published><updated>2010-03-10T23:18:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Governor Parkinson recently argued that the state&amp;#39;s current budget plight was caused because Kansas has cut taxes too much over the last 10 years.&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3949" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>site captain</name><uri>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/members/site-captain/default.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>The victory of the indoor smoking ban</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/02/26/the-victory-of-the-indoor-smoking-ban.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/02/26/the-victory-of-the-indoor-smoking-ban.aspx</id><published>2010-02-27T00:33:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-27T00:33:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;With House approval of the statewide indoor smoking ban and the bill now on its way to him for final signature, Governor Parkinson said, &amp;quot;This is a victory for workers, families, businesses and future generations.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3937" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>site captain</name><uri>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/members/site-captain/default.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Don't sue unless you're insured</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/02/17/don-t-sue-unless-you-re-insured.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/02/17/don-t-sue-unless-you-re-insured.aspx</id><published>2010-02-17T06:07:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-17T06:07:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;One&amp;nbsp;bill debated this week was&amp;nbsp;a lawsuit reform called &amp;quot;pay to play&amp;quot;,&amp;nbsp;meaning you couldn&amp;#39;t sue someone else in a car accident for your non-economic losses unless you carry personal injury vehicle insurance of your own. What do you think of the idea?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3932" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>site captain</name><uri>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/members/site-captain/default.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Describing tax breaks as appropriations</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/02/11/describing-tax-breaks-as-appropriations.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/02/11/describing-tax-breaks-as-appropriations.aspx</id><published>2010-02-12T02:14:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-12T02:14:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;In defense of a legislative proposal to repeal many&amp;nbsp;Kansas sales tax exemptions, Rep. Julie Menghini recently said &amp;quot;It&amp;#39;s time to put a stop to this irresponsible spending in the form of sales tax exemptions.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3929" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>site captain</name><uri>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/members/site-captain/default.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Tax increase less harmful to the poor?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/01/23/tax-increase-less-harmful-to-the-poor.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/01/23/tax-increase-less-harmful-to-the-poor.aspx</id><published>2010-01-23T16:58:00Z</published><updated>2010-01-23T16:58:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mark Tallman, lobbyist for Kansas school boards, testified recently&amp;nbsp;that &amp;quot;Although a sales tax is regressive [meaning it&amp;#39;s disproportionately paid by the poor], cutting education and social services hurts the poor even more.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&lt;span style="font-family:TimesNewRoman;font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:TimesNewRoman;font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3917" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>site captain</name><uri>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/members/site-captain/default.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Education budget pain is relative</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/12/23/cigarette-taxes-for-education.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/12/23/cigarette-taxes-for-education.aspx</id><published>2009-12-23T12:45:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-23T12:45:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The half of&amp;nbsp;state budget for K12 education was cut 5.3% for this year&amp;nbsp;(not counting K12&amp;nbsp;increases from local taxes) while the other half of the&amp;nbsp;state&amp;#39;s budget was cut by almost 15%.&amp;nbsp; Some question, for example,&amp;nbsp;whether this treats needy Medicaid recipients fairly compared to school districts.&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3913" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>site captain</name><uri>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/members/site-captain/default.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Stimulus job impact</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/11/02/stimulus-job-impact.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/11/02/stimulus-job-impact.aspx</id><published>2009-11-02T20:40:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-02T20:40:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;On October 17, the federal government reported that Stimulus funds to Kansas had saved/created 209 jobs in this state.&amp;nbsp; Two weeks later, that number mushroomed to 5,935 jobs.&amp;nbsp; Does that mean 5,726 workers were very recently on the verge of losing their jobs?&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3908" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>site captain</name><uri>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/members/site-captain/default.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>State red ink projections</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/08/26/state-red-ink-projections.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/08/26/state-red-ink-projections.aspx</id><published>2009-08-26T18:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-26T18:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Legislative&amp;nbsp;staff&amp;nbsp;now project a $536 million state budget deficit while the Governor&amp;nbsp;projects&amp;nbsp;a $183 million deficit. Last April, state&amp;nbsp;administrators said employer taxes would cover expanded unemployment benefits, but now say&amp;nbsp;we&amp;#39;ll be&amp;nbsp;$292 million short.&amp;nbsp;Do you think the Governor&amp;#39;s numbers are reliable?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3899" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>site captain</name><uri>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/members/site-captain/default.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>New Governor's performance</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/06/10/new-governor-s-performance.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/06/10/new-governor-s-performance.aspx</id><published>2009-06-10T15:08:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-10T15:08:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;With just a short period under his belt, Governor Mark Parkinson has already exercised his authority over the state budget, taxes, abortion, energy policy, and more.&amp;nbsp; What do you think about his performance so far?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3878" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>site captain</name><uri>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/members/site-captain/default.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Balanced budget barely</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/05/08/balanced-budget-barely.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/05/08/balanced-budget-barely.aspx</id><published>2009-05-09T02:20:00Z</published><updated>2009-05-09T02:20:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;With the 2009 Legislature&amp;#39;s final budget and tax bills now advanced to the Governor, the state has a&amp;nbsp;2010 general fund budget to spend&amp;nbsp;about $6 billion. If state revenues come in fully as projected, the year&amp;#39;s end budget balance will be $17,000.&amp;nbsp; What do you think of that planning?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3877" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>site captain</name><uri>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/members/site-captain/default.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>New Governor to affect coal votes?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/04/16/new-governor-to-affect-coal-votes.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/04/16/new-governor-to-affect-coal-votes.aspx</id><published>2009-04-16T15:05:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-16T15:05:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Governor Sebelius again vetoed a bill that would allow new coal-fired electricity plants to be&amp;nbsp;built in western Kansas.&amp;nbsp;Assuming Mark Parkinson is elevated to the role of Governor by the time the Legislature reconvenes April 29, do you think a veto override attempt then would be successful? Why or why not?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3867" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>site captain</name><uri>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/members/site-captain/default.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>DELAYED REPORT on April 3 HOUSE VOTES</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/04/07/delayed-report-on-april-3-house-votes.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/04/07/delayed-report-on-april-3-house-votes.aspx</id><published>2009-04-07T19:58:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-07T19:58:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The&amp;nbsp;hectic legislative&amp;nbsp;process apparently created problems in publishing the House Journal for April 3, which was not publicly available until early in the morning of April 7.&amp;nbsp; KansasVotes.org will have those voting reports uploaded to its site very soon.&amp;nbsp; Thank you for your patience.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3866" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>site captain</name><uri>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/members/site-captain/default.aspx</uri></author></entry></feed>