<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Kansas Votes Forum</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/</link><description>Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to The Sunflower State.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 (Debug Build: 30417.1769)</generator><item><title>State borrows another $700 million</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/07/07/state-borrows-another-700-million.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:4005</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The Governor and Legislative leaders just agreed to borrow $700 million from state idle funds in order to help state cashflow.&amp;nbsp; Could these idle funds have been used earlier to avoid tax increases?&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4005" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>No sale of state assets</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/05/09/no-sale-of-state-assets.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 18:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3985</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;An alternative to tax increases was defeated in the Legislature recently that would have required the state to sell about 1% of its&amp;nbsp;$10 billion (at least) real estate assets. What do you think of that idea?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3985" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Local chambers, taxes, business role</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/03/29/local-chambers-taxes-business-role.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3966</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;When 14 local chambers of commerce sent a letter recently to legislative leaders in support of state tax increases,&amp;nbsp;Sen. Karin Brownlee (R-Olathe) was quoted saying they are ignoring small-business members and, &amp;quot;The chambers have totally forgotten they exist for the promotion of business and not the promotion of government jobs.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3966" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tax cuts the culprit?</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/03/10/tax-cuts-the-culprit.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3949</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Governor Parkinson recently argued that the state&amp;#39;s current budget plight was caused because Kansas has cut taxes too much over the last 10 years.&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3949" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>The victory of the indoor smoking ban</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/02/26/the-victory-of-the-indoor-smoking-ban.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3937</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;With House approval of the statewide indoor smoking ban and the bill now on its way to him for final signature, Governor Parkinson said, &amp;quot;This is a victory for workers, families, businesses and future generations.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3937" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Don't sue unless you're insured</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/02/17/don-t-sue-unless-you-re-insured.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3932</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;One&amp;nbsp;bill debated this week was&amp;nbsp;a lawsuit reform called &amp;quot;pay to play&amp;quot;,&amp;nbsp;meaning you couldn&amp;#39;t sue someone else in a car accident for your non-economic losses unless you carry personal injury vehicle insurance of your own. What do you think of the idea?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3932" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Describing tax breaks as appropriations</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/02/11/describing-tax-breaks-as-appropriations.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3929</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;In defense of a legislative proposal to repeal many&amp;nbsp;Kansas sales tax exemptions, Rep. Julie Menghini recently said &amp;quot;It&amp;#39;s time to put a stop to this irresponsible spending in the form of sales tax exemptions.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3929" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tax increase less harmful to the poor?</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2010/01/23/tax-increase-less-harmful-to-the-poor.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3917</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark Tallman, lobbyist for Kansas school boards, testified recently&amp;nbsp;that &amp;quot;Although a sales tax is regressive [meaning it&amp;#39;s disproportionately paid by the poor], cutting education and social services hurts the poor even more.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&lt;span style="font-family:TimesNewRoman;font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:TimesNewRoman;font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3917" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Education budget pain is relative</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/12/23/cigarette-taxes-for-education.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3913</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The half of&amp;nbsp;state budget for K12 education was cut 5.3% for this year&amp;nbsp;(not counting K12&amp;nbsp;increases from local taxes) while the other half of the&amp;nbsp;state&amp;#39;s budget was cut by almost 15%.&amp;nbsp; Some question, for example,&amp;nbsp;whether this treats needy Medicaid recipients fairly compared to school districts.&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3913" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Stimulus job impact</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/11/02/stimulus-job-impact.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3908</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;On October 17, the federal government reported that Stimulus funds to Kansas had saved/created 209 jobs in this state.&amp;nbsp; Two weeks later, that number mushroomed to 5,935 jobs.&amp;nbsp; Does that mean 5,726 workers were very recently on the verge of losing their jobs?&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3908" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>State red ink projections</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/08/26/state-red-ink-projections.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3899</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Legislative&amp;nbsp;staff&amp;nbsp;now project a $536 million state budget deficit while the Governor&amp;nbsp;projects&amp;nbsp;a $183 million deficit. Last April, state&amp;nbsp;administrators said employer taxes would cover expanded unemployment benefits, but now say&amp;nbsp;we&amp;#39;ll be&amp;nbsp;$292 million short.&amp;nbsp;Do you think the Governor&amp;#39;s numbers are reliable?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3899" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Governor's performance</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/06/10/new-governor-s-performance.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3878</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;With just a short period under his belt, Governor Mark Parkinson has already exercised his authority over the state budget, taxes, abortion, energy policy, and more.&amp;nbsp; What do you think about his performance so far?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3878" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Balanced budget barely</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/05/08/balanced-budget-barely.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 02:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3877</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;With the 2009 Legislature&amp;#39;s final budget and tax bills now advanced to the Governor, the state has a&amp;nbsp;2010 general fund budget to spend&amp;nbsp;about $6 billion. If state revenues come in fully as projected, the year&amp;#39;s end budget balance will be $17,000.&amp;nbsp; What do you think of that planning?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3877" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Governor to affect coal votes?</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/04/16/new-governor-to-affect-coal-votes.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:05:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3867</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Governor Sebelius again vetoed a bill that would allow new coal-fired electricity plants to be&amp;nbsp;built in western Kansas.&amp;nbsp;Assuming Mark Parkinson is elevated to the role of Governor by the time the Legislature reconvenes April 29, do you think a veto override attempt then would be successful? Why or why not?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3867" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>DELAYED REPORT on April 3 HOUSE VOTES</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/04/07/delayed-report-on-april-3-house-votes.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3866</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The&amp;nbsp;hectic legislative&amp;nbsp;process apparently created problems in publishing the House Journal for April 3, which was not publicly available until early in the morning of April 7.&amp;nbsp; KansasVotes.org will have those voting reports uploaded to its site very soon.&amp;nbsp; Thank you for your patience.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3866" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Collective gun rights vs. individual</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/03/22/collective-gun-rights-vs-individual.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3860</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;If the Legislature allows it, Kansans&amp;nbsp;could&amp;nbsp;vote to change the state&amp;#39;s constitution to clarify 2nd Amendment gun rights. The US Supreme Court recently ruled it is an individual right, not a collective one, but an old Kansas court opinion says otherwise. Should each person have the right, or should the public? What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3860" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>"Stop &amp; think" before taking federal funds</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/03/11/quot-stop-amp-think-quot-before-taking-federal-funds.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3855</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Senate Bill 296 will be heard today, to prevent Kansas from spending any federal &amp;quot;stimulus&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;money until detailed agency reports show its effect on the state budget deficit in two years. What do you think of the proposal?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3855" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Limit property tax valuation growth?</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/02/25/limit-property-tax-valuation-growth.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3814</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The&amp;nbsp;House Taxation Committee held hearings today on whether property tax valuations should be limited to 2% annual growth while local governments would be free to vote into place whatever mill levy they choose to cover their budget needs.&amp;nbsp; What do you think of the proposal?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3814" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>$1.7 billion to Kansas from stimulus</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/02/18/1-7-billion-to-kansas-from-stimulus.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3809</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The federal stimulus bill, The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, was signed into law by President Obama. Kansas stands to receive $1.7 billion&amp;nbsp;from it over the next two years. Should state lawmakers turn down any parts of it over which they&amp;nbsp;have control? What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3809" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bill could reinstate school property taxes on cars</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/02/11/bill-could-reinstate-school-property-taxes-on-cars.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3793</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;SB 242 was introduced recently to gradually subject motor vehicles to school property tax mill levies once again, although it also gradually reduces the overall property tax&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;assessment rate&amp;quot; on vehicles.&amp;nbsp;Different counties could&amp;nbsp;see a net vehicle tax increase or net decrease. What do you think of the proposal?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3793" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Federal hearing on coal plant lawsuit</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/02/05/federal-hearing-on-coal-plant-lawsuit.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3782</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;A&amp;nbsp;federal judge is now considering whether to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Sunflower Electric claiming the state unconstitutionally blocked its&amp;nbsp;coal-fired plants. The Kansas Attorney General&amp;nbsp;argues&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;expected&amp;nbsp;carbon dioxide emission is a danger that state law compels them&amp;nbsp;to control. Should the lawsuit be dismissed? What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3782" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Budget cuts to be debated in House</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/02/03/budget-cuts-to-be-debated-in-house.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3781</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The full House chamber this week will debate a $208 expenditure cut to the current year&amp;#39;s state general fund budget. Of that cut, $66 million would come from K-12 education, which makes up more than half the budget. What do you think of the proposal?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3781" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Proportionally share the cuts?</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/01/19/proportionally-share-the-cuts.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3778</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The State General Fund&amp;nbsp;budget for this year is projected to end with more than a $186 million shortfall, or about 2.9% short. Assuming it&amp;#39;s addressed with budget cuts, should they be made upon all agencies across-the-board, or should specific programs and agencies be targeted? Bear in mind, next year&amp;#39;s deficit is estimated at more than $1 billion. What do you think?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3778" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Windpower Priority</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/01/13/windpower-priority.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3777</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;It was a large part of the Governor&amp;#39;s annual state address this week.&amp;nbsp; How much greater attention do you think the Legislature should commit to promoting wind-generated electricity in Kansas?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3777" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sebelius to protect K-12 without tax increase?</title><link>http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/blogs/kansasvotes/archive/2009/01/04/sebelius-to-protect-k-12-without-tax-increase.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7666e51c-5cfe-4c9f-a812-0288d999e095:3656</guid><dc:creator>site captain</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;News reports quote Governor Sebelius, despite the state&amp;#39;s budget woes, as saying &amp;quot;I&amp;#39;m not proposing a tax increase.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; Regarding K-12 education funding, Sebelius said there will be no significant increases, &amp;quot;...but there are, trust me, ways that we can kind of protect the investment.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; What do you think of her assessment?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kansasvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3656" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>